My name is Dr. Joe Pojman. I am the Executive Director of Texas Alliance for Life, and I and speaking for that organization in support of Senate Bill 9, the Human Life Protection Act.

SB 9 is a complete ban on abortion, beginning at fertilization, that will go into effect when and to the extent the Supreme Court reverses or modifies Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

I have lobbied in these halls for more than three decades. This bill will do something that we have all dreamed of — complete protection from abortion for unborn babies in their mothers’ wombs.

We cannot thank Senator Paxton enough for authoring this momentous bill.

When the Supreme Court Reverses or Modifies Roe v. Wade, Texas Will Need a New Law.

The Supreme Court’s terrible precedent in the 1973 Roe v. Wade and 1992 Planned Parenthood v. Casey decisions ties the hands of the Legislature. It prevents you from banning abortion or imposing any abortion regulation that creates a “substantial obstacle to the woman’s effective right to elect the procedure” before viability of the unborn child. Viability is when the unborn child can continue to live if born alive.

We saw what the Supreme Court did in the Hellerstedt case when the court decided that  some of the HB 2 safety regulations imposed a substantial obstacle to abortion. The result was an unenforceable law and a court order for Texas to pay more than $2,000,000 in attorneys’ fees to the plaintiffs.

However, within a matter of months, the Supreme Court may change that terrible precedent. We are hopeful, but not certain, that the Court, now with three new appointees, may be willing to take a fresh look at Roe and Casey — unencumbered by precedent — and give you legislators more latitude to protect unborn children before viability.

According to Americans United for Life, there are as many as 60 cases involving abortion bans and regulations in the pipeline. The court could take up any of these as a vehicle to revisit Roe and Casey.

One of those cases, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, involves a Mississippi law banning abortions on non-viable unborn babies beginning at 15 weeks, a clear violation of the Roe and Casey precedent.

If the Supreme Court changes its precedent and allows states to protect non-viable unborn babies, Texas needs to be ready with a new law to ban abortion to the extent allowable under the new precedent.

Senate Bill 9 is that new law.

Under SB 9, any person who performs an abortion (except to save the mother’s life) commits a first-degree felony. Any woman on whom an abortion is performed or attempted may not be prosecuted.

Regardless of what the Supreme Court does to allow increased protection for non-viable unborn babies, SB 9 would afford the same protection to unborn babies in Texas.

  • If the Court upholds Mississippi’s 15-week ban, our law will automatically ban abortions after 15 weeks.
  • If the Court upholds a heartbeat law, our law automatically bans abortion to that extent.
  • Or a ban on abortions for discrimination reasons — race, gender, or disability — our law would protect those unborn babies to that extent.
  • If the Court allows states to completely ban abortion, our law would ban abortion beginning at fertilization.

And those bans will be a first-degree felony offense, exactly what an abortion doctor deserves.

Listen to the Scientists: Life Begins at Fertilization

We need to protect unborn babies beginning at fertilization. Science recognizes that an unborn child is a human being, just like each of us. The life of an individual human being begins at fertilization and continues to develop through each of the 40 weeks of pregnancy, through birth, infancy, childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. We all came into being at fertilization. That is established biological fact. When people say, “Listen to the scientists,” my organization agrees 100%.

Current Texas Law Recognizes Unborn Children Beginning at Fertilization

Our statutes and rules in Texas recognize that life exists in the womb and begins at fertilization. We have numerous provisions that reflect that.

Perhaps the most striking is the protection afforded to unborn children in our state from violent crimes of assault and murder in the Penal Code. Chapter 1 defines an “individual” as a “human being that is alive, including an unborn child at every stage of gestation from fertilization until birth.”

Relying on that, Chapter 19 protects an unborn child from homicide, taking the life of the unborn child against the mother’s consent the same as a newborn child, indeed, the same as all of us.

This has been in place since 2003 and was passed with bipartisan support. Some of the members of this committee voted for that law, including Senators Lucio, Nelson, Zaffirini, and of course you, Chairman Hughes. We cannot thank all of you enough.

By banning elective abortion beginning at fertilization, SB 9 is a natural extension of that law.

Abortions Prior to Six or Seven Weeks Gestation

In 2019, there were about 57,000 reported abortions in Texas. It is estimated that at least 10% of those abortions — 6,000 or more — were performed before six or seven weeks of gestation, before the unborn baby’s heartbeat can be detected.

Do we have an obligation to protect all unborn children, even very early in pregnancy? Yes, Texas does have that obligation.

Senate Bill 9 will do just that, and we urge you to support it.

Thank you.

Texas Alliance for Life’s executive director Joe Pojman, Ph.D., gave this testimony to the Texas Senate’s State Affairs Committee in support of Senate Bill 9, the Human Life Protection Act, on March 15, 2021.

One Response to “Dr. Joe Pojman’s Testimony on SB 9 on March 15, 2021”

  1. Roberto Alvarez

    The issue is really left up to the states who want to legislate to restrict / ban abortion.

    Article I of the Constitution grants the sole power to “make all laws” to the Legislatures (Congress and States).
    Article III does not grant the power to make any laws, whatsoever, to the Courts – they have none – especially, in matters that are the sole jurisdiction of the States, as defined by the Constitution and this matter is.

    Unconstituional and illegal laws by the Federal Government (which are beyond their Article I powers), court rulings (which are beyond their Article III powers) – as this matter is – are just that – unconstitutional and illegal.

    Any and all acts by the Federal Government, which are unconstitutional and illegal – may be legally nullified by the States – and should be!

    It is even more important now that the States exercise that right / power – now that we have an unconstitutional and illegal administration in Washington that was installed by an election that has been proven to be totally fraudulent by reams of proven, undisputed, documented evidence!

    The only question is: will the States have the courage to exercise their sole and exclusive powers to nullify unconstituional and illegal acts of the Federal Government!


Leave a Reply